In The end of something by Ernest Hemingway we have the layout of change, disillusion, commitment, independence and also acceptance. Taken native his The Complete short Stories arsenal the story is report in the third person by an unnamed narrator and also after reading the story the reader realises that the title of the story deserve to refer to one of two people the end of logging in Horton’s Bay and also the decrease of the Mill or the finish of Nick and Marjorie’s relationship. These parallels’ are significant as Hemingway is perhaps using the start of the story, once he describes the Mill in Horton’s just (ten years previously), as symbolism because that Nick and also Marjorie’s relationship. Favor the Mill closeup of the door down and the manufacturing of lumber ending, an in similar way at the end of the story, Nick and Marjorie’s relationship pertains to an end.

You are watching: Ernest hemingway the end of something

There is other symbolism in the story which additionally may it is in important. Marjorie describes the old Mill as looking choose a ‘castle.’ that is feasible that Marjorie is romanticising the old Mill, which the reader already is aware that Hemingway is using as symbolism for Nick’s connection with Marjorie. This consequently would indicate that Marjorie views the relationship in different ways to Nick. If she watch it together a loving (romantic) relationship, Nick meanwhile feels that it has run its course. It may additionally be far-ranging that Nick no answer Marjorie once she speak him she thinks the Mill looks favor a castle. This could suggest the the old Mill each other no much more than a ruin to Nick, which would certainly mirror his feelings around the relationship. If noþeles Nick appears to it is in disillusioned v the relationship even going as far as informing Marjorie later on in the story that ‘it no fun any type of more. Not any of it.’

Symbolically the fish are likewise important together they can be seen as symbolism for Nick himself. Just as Marjorie has an obstacle catching any fish in ~ the start of the story, Hemingway may be likewise suggesting the Marjorie will not record (or marry) Nick. That is also feasible that Nick go not want to make a commitment to Marjorie. The absence of interest shown by the fish (with the bait) in some means mirrors the absence of attention that Nick has in the relationship.

Nick’s human body language, an especially when he is sit by the camp fire ~ above the shore through Marjorie may likewise be significant. Nick finds it daunting to confront Marjorie, preferring no to look in ~ her once he speak her that the partnership is over. Some doubters suggest this is crucial as that highlights a degree of cowardice in ~ Nick. Another interesting aspect of the story is the advent of Bill’s character. Despite he is just in the story briefly, his figure is far-reaching as that is v his discussion with Nick that the leader realises that Nick has actually planned his break up with Marjorie, having most likely debated it with Bill prior to going fishing through Marjorie.

Though Nick may have actually calculated his rest up with Marjorie his reaction come her rowing away (he lies on the down on the blanket, facing the ground) argues that he did have some feelings because that her. That is also possible that Hemingway is making use of Nick’s personality to highlight the some males (now and at the moment the story was written) room not maybe to do a commitment (get married). That for their very own reasons they prefer to live life as they think it need to be lived, as an adventure fairly than being confined (as they would feel) come a relationship. Regardless of how Nick is feeling, Hemingway does leaving him v some hope. By introducing Bill there is a opportunity that Hemingway is saying that a new adventure awaits Nick. Just as Marjorie might symbolise one old method of life for Nick, Bill may symbolise the future. That is additionally interesting that Bill, after ~ he talks to Nick, check on the 2 fishing rods. It is possible that Hemingway is saying that invoice is picking up from were Marjorie left off.

Marjorie’s reaction to the rest up may likewise be necessary as with it Hemingway might be exploring the layout of acceptance and also independence. Marjorie, renders no pleas through Nick to shot and rescue something in the relationship. Rather she conveniently tells Nick the she will certainly take the watercraft while he can walk back around the point. If anything the would appear that Marjorie is accepting the Nick wants to end the relationship and also the reality that she takes the boat, might act together symbolism for her independence. Just as Nick was in control of the boat at the start of the story, Marjorie takes manage of it in ~ the end. Marjorie’s physical movement, that rowing away from Nick may additionally be vital as it suggests, at the very least symbolically, the she is moving away from Nick. That is quite possible that Marjorie has embraced that the partnership is end and, through rowing away from Nick, is moving on v her life.

McManus, Dermot. "The end of something by Ernest Hemingway." The sit Bee. The sitting Bee, 23 Aug. 2014. Web.

I really don’t average to it is in a meanie, yet once again the apparent symbolism in this analysis is merely too pat. I read this evaluation after reading the story, then review the story again and fell to wondering: why, because that example, choose out the out ‘the mill looking favor a castle’ together somehow symbolic of romance with Nick’s quiet – making no an answer – his ‘rejection’ the a romantic relationship with Marjorie and also that that feels the ‘ruin’ of the old mill is symbolic of the end of that relationship?

Then there’s the – rather desperate – identification of Marjorie having actually no luck recording fish with having actually no lucky ‘catching’ Nick. As for the pointer that Hemingway is stating the themes of ‘acceptance’ and also ‘independence’, fine – hmm. A rather much more convincing explanation would be that this is a vacation romance which has run that is course quicker for one than the other. Certainly, Nick can feel bad around ending it with Marjorie yet then why is that surprising: that still likes her.

I agree the Bill turning up at the end and also asking just how it the separation went does absolutely indicate that Nick had actually informed that it would certainly happen, but is arrival after that is strange in that he would not have known in ~ what suggest in the trip ‘the conversation would certainly be had’. And also his comments additionally suggest the he was surprised it all went smoothly. So would he really bother to revolve up later on in the evening fairly than wait because that an account of the all later on? i doubt it.

The machine of Bill turning up is a rather crass relocate by the writer which doesn’t convince, particularly as the story, together written, suggests that return Nick did desire to end it, that did not know how and also was in no place to choose the timing. Had he been, I doubt he would have damaged it every off also before setting off.

This story an initial appeared in Hemingway’s an initial collection, In our Time, in 1927 and also was praised by numerous at the moment – despite by no method universally. And I suspect that what attracted such prominence and style – because that example, after analysis the volume Scribner’s Max Perkins contacted Hemingway come ask even if it is he had any kind of other work he might treatment to submit – was just how really unusual that the stories’ format was because that 1927.

’Modernism’ was every the rage at the time, and rather banally, though not unusually, modernism to be for many identified by no being what together then traditional (Harold Loeb/Robert Cohn of The Sun, also submitted his 2nd novel to Boni & Liveright after removing every definite and also indefinite write-ups as a ‘modernist’ gesture. The publishers simply reinstated them).

Ninety-odd year on – or even 20 years on – I very much doubt any of these stories in In ours Time would certainly raise or have raised even fifty percent an eyebrow. Castle are essentially quite adolescent and also as because that ‘literary worth’ . . .


I intended to add why not, as possible symbolism, cite that the irradiate from the fire only reached the leaf of the lake, yet did reflect turn off the two steel fishing rods, or that when gutting she perch Marjorie do the failure of ‘taking the ventral fin out’?

Or that as soon as returning to the beach, Marjorie ‘pulled hard’ on the oars, so that the boat ‘went way up on the beach’ and ‘little waves come in through it’? together examples could equally work as ‘symbolism’.

Surely Hemingway, by highlighting together things meant them to it is in significant? Or, top top the various other hand, perhaps he didn’t.


Thanks Patrick.



I am mindful that I could be coming across as wilfully contrary about Hemingway. If you look increase his books on Goodreads, friend will uncover far, far an ext who ‘love’ him 보다 those, prefer me, who are highly dubious of and also baffled through his call (which has, to be frank, been decreasing for the past 50 years). But believe me ns am no trying come be various or apostatising because that the hell of it. In fact, I’ve constantly disliked it when individual do that kind of thing and also think the ineffably silly.

Last year, I read – for the very first time – The Sun additionally Rises. It was billed top top the back of my paperback together ‘a masterpiece’ and also Hemingway to be ‘a writer of genius’. I was puzzled.

The novel not ‘bad’ however pretty bloody ordinary. Writing about it elsewhere I’ve described it together a sour, sardonic love story, and also I’ll stick v that. As for somehow portraying the desolate and also ruined stays of a supposed ‘lost generation’, individual who to be so fucked increase by world War ns that they can do nothing but drink and shag, I believed ‘pull the various other one, matey, it is bollocks’. However how, ns wondered, walk Hemingway acquire such prominence?

I began out by composing an entry because that my blog and also began a little bit of elevator reading. And the more I read, the an ext I found I had to and did read, and also the more I realised that Hemingway, his work, his climb to prominence, the different social alters which assisted to fuel that rise to prominence and also his an extremely slow, but an extremely definite, decrease demanded something much more than just a 1,500/2000 word blog entry. I’m no yet finished.

The totality story, as far as i am pertained to touches as much upon the advancement of modern literary criticism, ‘modernism’, the comprehensive changes in the posting industry, the function of academia (amounting to pretty much and also industry) who favor to gain their claws top top ‘a writer’, the evolution and also expansion that marketing and also advertising and also the expansion of the concept of ‘celebrity’ together it go on Hemingway, the writer, and his novels and also stories.

For example, and I have not yet checked out this comment on, ~ the splash that made v In our Time, The Sun additionally Rises and Men without Women, Hemingway started to punch it. Also A taking leave To eight is much more a soppy love story 보다 a particularly ‘literary’ work.

He do his early splash essentially because he, as a composing personality, and also what he to be producing, were simply so, so different. And The Sun and also many that his story were ‘shocking’ – we are talking around 90 years ago, remember. The was catnip come his publishers, Scribner’s, who felt – well, Max Perkins, a junior exec feel – they must be relocating with the times and catering because that a younger generation.

The extra ingredient was, that course, Hemingway himself, a personality who had an substantial talent because that self-promotion and also monumental self-belief. Arguably, he was a sociopath, charming as soon as he wanted to be, utterly ruthless and also despicable as soon as it suited him (a good example would be a city he wrote around Dorothy Parker, supposedly a close friend, sending up a recent suicide attempt of hers which he review out publicly at a party). Together for writing, Hemingway soon, currently by 1930 started to believe his own bullshit and also regarded self as crucial ‘authority’ on writing and also took come pontificating on writing. Fine if you are 60/70 – well, not really, but you obtain my point – and have a substantial body of successful work-related to her credit. However Hemingway didn’t.

His following work, the bizarre fatality In The Afternoon bombed bad (and Scribner’s tried tough to dissuade that from posting it) – that in Depression dustbowl era America want to read about a well-off, high-earning novelist swanning approximately Spain and also pontificating at not suitable length around bullfighting, writing and art. For one thing the americans didn’t provide a flying fuck around bullfighting. Together for his book, take it a look at Max Eastman’s perspicacious review of it, Bull In The Afternoon, which makes some very telling points about Hemingway, his bullshit and his psyche. It at some point earned the a slap in the face from Hemingway who couldn’t abide gift criticised.

Then come Winner takes Nothing, a repertoire of quick stories, which additionally didn’t set the human being or the doubters on fire.

Three years later – and also Hemingway was start to worry about falling out of public view – to Have and also Have no (cobbled with each other from previous brief stories) didn’t set much alight either. Because that Whom The Bell Tolls did carry out well, but mainly because of the association with the Gary Cooper movie of 1942 and – an complete about-turn for Hemingway who had actually previously pooh-poohed ‘commercial writers’ – since it became a US book of the Month and sold through the shedload to ‘middlebrows’.

And that, Dermot, to be pretty lot it. The succeeding novels published during his lifetime, v the notable exemption of the novella The Old Man and The Sea, were awful, and also after that died, his estate cashed in by ‘editing’ reams and also reams the manuscripts he had written however couldn’t gain together come publish more work in his name and also make a bit much more moolah.

What fascinated and also fascinates me, i beg your pardon is why mine ‘blog entry’ is obtaining longer and also longer (and why i am analysis In ours Time and also Men Without ladies – it’s certainly not because that pleasure) is the rise and rise that Hemingway on, to it is in honest, very little talent.

Yes, he had a particular turn of phrase – i m sorry hack doesn’t? (I to be one because that 44 years, despite Hemingways to be a reporter for seven months in Kansas City and also later in Paris began out merely selling freelance colour piece to the Toronto Star, he and his wife Hadley actually paying their means from her generous trust money – the ‘years the poverty’ are additionally bullshit, although the trust fund did take it a nosedive, however the exceptionally generosity exchange rate typical their dollar earnings let them gain by fairly well.)

But in spite of the early ‘shock of his style’ he to be something the a one-trick pony, certainly no an excellent thinker and – return he refuse it vehemently – nice much every one of his fiction was semi-autobiographical v precious small artistry burnishing it and also transforming it.

His composing wasn’t fifty percent as good as he thought it come be, and what that did have, he lost. Simply read, for example, The art Of The quick Story composed in the 1950s – this is the work of a writer the genius? that is amateurish come an embarrassing degree. Provide it a read and also decide for yourself. He had eras to write and edit it, and there to be no push on him, however it reads choose something i turned the end in my an initial year at college.

Hemingway was certainly extraordinary – as in extra-ordinary – but then so to be Idi Amin and Maundy Gregory. Yet his ‘story’ – his success, his hubris, his bizarre self-image – the is almost and very ironically the stuff of fiction.

See more: How Many Feet In A Story Of A House ? How Many Feet Are In A Building Floor

PS ns came throughout your blog searching down reviews of some of his short stories. Sorry to bang top top a little, however I believed I might try to explain why i take together a left-field watch of Hemingway.